Things are heating up between Disney and Scarlett Johansson! In the latest update on the ongoing lawsuit, it turns out the House of Mouse did not fathom the 36-year-old actress bringing their dispute to the public and is now trying to gravity the whole thing to go overdue sealed doors immediately.
As you may recall, Johnasson rocked the entertainment industry on July 29 when she filed a lawsuit versus Disney. In her complaint, she argued that the media conglomerate had breached her contract for Black Widow by releasing the mucosa simultaneously to Disney and traditional theaters, thus costing her potentially millions of dollars in revenue. Her try-on with Disney supposedly guaranteed an sectional theatrical release with her salary contingent on the box office performance. However, COVID-19 obviously f**ked that up and forced the visitor to get creative with their upcoming projects.
Related: Shang-Chi Star Simu Liu Fires Back At Disney CEO For Calling The Upcoming Mucosa ‘An Experiment’
Upon hearing the news, Disney publicly responded by ultimatum that Johansson once cashed in a $20 million paycheck and tabbed the suit “sad and distressing” in light of the pandemic. A shocking response — expressly when most unsupportable they would have handled the legal matter privately. However, it seems like Disney now wants to throne lanugo a variegated path…
According to The Hollywood Reporter, Disney wants to stave a trial by taxing in a late-night filing to the Superior Magistrate of Los Angeles on Friday that the lawsuit be moved to arbitration. The suit moreover dished out some harsh words for Johansson and her legal team in the document, saying:
“In a futile effort to evade this unavoidable result (and generate publicity through a public filing), Periwinkle excluded Marvel as a party to this lawsuit — substituting instead its parent visitor Disney under contract-interference theories. But longstanding principles do not permit such gamesmanship.”
DAMN! That is brutal!
Per Deadline, Disney personal that nowhere in the contract did it say that the picture’s release had to be sectional to theaters, stating:
“Although Marvel and Disney share Periwinkle’s frustration with the challenges associated with releasing films during an ever-shifting public-health crisis, Periwinkle’s claims that Marvel breached the Try-on and Disney induced that violate or otherwise interfered with the Try-on have no merit. There is nothing in the Try-on requiring that a ‘wide theatrical release’ moreover be an ‘exclusive’ theatrical release. The contract does not mandate theatrical distribution — let vacated require that any such distribution be exclusive.”
Their tribunal then argued that Black Widow was played on over 9,000 screens in the country, which tangibly satisfied their obligation to show the movie on no less than 1,500 screens. Additionally, the magistrate documents stated that the mucosa made over $367 million worldwide at the box office and $125 million in streaming. Disney compared the release to other Marvel films, saying that the opening weekend was “more than that of many other Marvel Cinematic Universe films, including Thor: The Dark World; Ant-Man; Ant-Man and the Wasp; and Guardians of the Galaxy.” And to top it off, the lawyers personal that despite the pandemic, the visitor still “made good on its promises.”
That’s debatable in the vision of the new momma! We will have to see how those arguments hold up in the next phase of their legal dispute.
Since then, Johansson has responded through her shyster on Saturday, slamming Disney for the “misogynistic attack” and “trying to hibernate its misconduct” with a request to move to arbitration. John Berlinski said in a statement to Deadline:
“After initially responding to this litigation with a misogynistic wade versus Scarlett Johansson, Disney is now, predictably, trying to hibernate its misconduct in a confidential arbitration. Why is Disney so wrung of litigating this specimen in public?”
It does sound kind of fishy…
“Because it knows that Marvel’s promises to requite ‘Black Widow’ a typical theatrical release ‘like its other films’ had everything to do with guaranteeing that Disney wouldn’t cannibalize box office receipts in order to uplift Disney subscriptions. Yet that is exactly what happened — and we squint forward to presenting the overwhelming vestige that proves it.”
We will have to wait and see what happens, Perezcious readers! But one thing we do know with this messy lawsuit is that in the magistrate of public opinion, people seem to be Team Scarlett. So Disney may want to tomfool it with these savage thunderous backs! Reactions to this latest update in ScarJo’s lawsuit? Let us know in the comments (below)!
[Image via Marvel/YouTube]